Every interview costs you twice.
The interview's the first cost; the write-up that night is the second. Verilo scores and ranks each candidate, then drafts that write-up for you — quotes and timestamps attached — so those hours go back to sourcing.
Operator-level ownership, with unusually specific execution detail.
Use her where the role needs ownership through messy, ambiguous handoffs.
Not another platform to live in.
Verilo meets you where you already work and turns the interviews you already run into something you can send, sell, and stand behind.
Nothing to switch
Connect your calendar once and you're done. Verilo rides the inbox and tools you already use. Your ATS stays your ATS.
Built for your job
Every other tool optimizes a corporate hiring committee. Verilo is built for the firm whose business is placing people — your workflow, your incentives.
The output is yours to sell
Not an internal scorecard for someone else. A client-ready, evidence-backed read you hand your client to win the req.
The second time, you're not getting paid.
Once in the room. Then again that night, writing it up from memory. And when a client asks "why this one?", all you've got is a feeling.
3 interviews become a second shift.
Writeups from memory. Evidence scattered. Client pushback answered from gut.
3 interviews become 3 drafts, evidence attached — not a second shift.
Every read has the evidence attached. Your hours go back to sourcing.
Connect once. The writeups arrive on their own.
The capture effort goes to zero. The judgment still stays yours, with better material in front of you.
Connect your calendar
One click. Verilo sees your scheduled interviews — nothing else changes.
Verilo joins the interview
It auto-captures the call. You run the conversation exactly as you always have.
Your draft lands in your inbox
The heavy lifting's done — a measured, evidence-backed draft, ready to edit and send.
The on-ramp is simple. The defensible depth is there when the stakes make it worth opening.
Measured, not vibed.
Plenty of tools can summarize an interview. Verilo is built to apply the same behavioral criteria every time, so the read is something you can stand behind.
A nice summary
Generates plausible notes from the transcript. Different shape every time, no consistent scale, nothing you'd defend to a client. Useful — but it's the same thing everyone has.
A measured read
A multimodal model applies the same behavioral constructs, the same way, on every candidate — each anchored to a moment in the recording. Tested for reliability, built for consistency, and always surfaced for a human decision.
Verilo measures the interview, not the person. Every read is based on what the candidate said, how clearly they explained it, and where that evidence appears in the recording. The same criteria are applied across candidates, every time. You keep the judgment; Verilo gives you the record.
When it's your name on the line, the case is already there.
Most days, the read in your inbox is all you need. When the stakes rise — a contested req, a client pushing back — the full evidence view is one click from that email. Depth when you want it, not another tool to live in.
Dana is the safer submit when the role needs ownership through ambiguity.
The case: her examples show specific scope, sequence, and measurable business impact. Raj has strong delivery language, but less evidence of independent diagnosis.
Win the placement. Keep the receipts.
Every Verilo write-up is backed by quotes, timestamps, and the interview evidence your client can actually review.
Get your evenings back — and stop losing placements you should win.
We're onboarding recruiting firms as early design partners. Connect your calendar and see your first report this week.
Get early access